Lost: What Kate Does. Or Did. Or Something Like That.

February 11th, 2010 | by | lost

Feb
11

As usual, my brain hurt (in a good way) after watching Lost this week. Though it didn’t REALLY answer any questions, it did start to go in that direction, I thought.

I have trouble recapping Lost in any sort of normal way – I suppose that’s because it’s anything but a normal show, so I’m going to do what I did last week and break it into two parts: Alternate Reality and The Island. Since we didn’t get anything with Ben and the Others with him or Smokey Locke with Richard, I’m not going to say too much about them, except for some fascinating thoughts about Richard in this post from JOpinionated.

OK, so, let’s start with the

Alternate reality

Further evidence that this group of people are drawn together and that no matter how reality changes, some things stay the same.

Remember how Kate was the one who delivered Aaron in the jungle first time around? No coincidence that she’s there when Claire almost gives birth. She and Claire have a strong connection. That stuffed animal, the orca whale in Claire’s bag? Didn’t Aaron have one just like it when he was living with Kate?

And Claire is fated to raise her child, at least off-island. The couple who were supposed to adopt suddenly split just before Claire flies to the states? And the wife doesn’t bother to call to say, “Nevermind”? That’s because Claire was supposed to get on that plane. I can’t help but think that somehow Jack will find out Claire is his sister (trust me, I’m chomping at the bit to get to that part, too, but patience!) and they’ll be drawn together.

Read full story

4 Comments »

Lost: LA X

February 4th, 2010 | by | lost

Feb
04

First, let me just say this about Lost’s return to the airwaves for its final season:

Wow.

Forgetting for a moment all the questions it answered and new ones it raised, I find myself continually amazed at the skill of the writers, actors, directors – hell, even the Best Boy deserves an Emmy so far as I’m concerned.

This two-parter was gorgeously filmed. Impeccably acted. Fantastically – and minimally – written. Surprises were truly surprises. Neither acting nor writing telegraphed what was going to come next.

And hear this, Emmy voters: If you do NOT give Elizabeth Mitchell an Emmy this time around, I will personally come to your houses and insist you give me an explanation. There’s no way that I should have cried when seeing Juliet die even in the “previously on Lost,” scenes. Oh, and Josh Holloway? Going back and forth between his alternate universe “Hey there, pretty lady” personality and his utterly changed James Who Loved Juliet, I think he may be the best actor on a show filled with amazing actors. If he doesn’t get one, I’m also gonna camp out on Emmy voters’ lawns.

It’s so hard to dissect an episode of Lost. There’s so much there and it takes repeated viewing to truly get everything. And this was TWO HOURS. So I’m just gonna go through it all by location and probably will have to come back later and do another post.

Read full story

11 Comments »

Lost without Lost?

January 2nd, 2010 | by | lost

Jan
02

I initially sat down to write a post about how ABC is offering 815 (of course) fans the opportunity for a sneak peek at the Lost season premiere. But what I ended up with was something much more: A realization that no network has ever done as brilliant a job marketing one of its shows as ABC has done with Lost.

One could argue that the marketing of Lost has been the first to fully take advantage of all the tools available to keep fans interested and amped up in the off-season.

We had the Missing Pieces webisodes, which were devoured by fans, even as they disparaged them. The Hanso Foundation commercials and website, which had people calling 800 numbers and furiously trying to figure out where everything all fit in.

Remember the Oceanic Air website where you could click on a seating chart and occasionally get glimpses into who sat where and other tidbits?

Lost University accompanies the Season 5 Blu-Ray.

And, all along, there’s been full recognition that fan blogs were important to keeping the buzz going and ABC’s brought those bloggers to Hawaii for full-access trips.

Now, ABC has offered fans the chance to be among 815 who will get an advance peek at the Season 6 (otherwise known as the Last Season) premiere. There’s a short quiz to enter and I got five of the six answers right without blinking. I was allowed to change the final answer – heck, I couldn’t enter unless I had all six right, it waited until you got all six before giving you a “submit” button.

ABC rewards fans for knowing the minutae. They never came down on all the sites that used screen shots of the show to point out Easter eggs or even just illustrate blog posts. They knew that by letting fans use the show as they wanted, the fans would keep coming back.

Read full story

3 Comments »

V, the new chapter

November 27th, 2009 | by | science fiction, v

Nov
27

Once in a while, there’s a show I watch where I can’t be online when it’s on. I don’t want to miss anything; I want to concentrate.

v-imageLost, unsurprisingly, is chief among those shows. Battlestar Galactica was another. Fringe almost is like that. I get very absorbed and forget I’m online for most of the show. 24 would be like that, except I live-blog it over at Blogs4Bauer, so that’s an entirely different animal. But don’t do other stuff online while I’m watching 24, at least.

V has filled the void left by Battlestar in that sense (though I suspect Caprica will also be an online-free zone for me).

It doesn’t hurt that two of the main characters are refugees of two of my favorite shows: Elizabeth Mitchell, Juliet from Lost, and Joel Gretsch, Tom Baldwin from The 4400. It doesn’t hurt that I’ve seen the original V miniseries from the ’80s more times than I can even count. Possibly as many times as Star Wars. True story. Oh, and I mean the original miniseries, not the sequel miniseries, in which one of the half-alien babies looked like a puppet I could have made. And I suck at art projects.

This is V for a post-Cold War, post-9/11 world. The original V was very much informed by World War II, the Holocaust and a totalitarian Soviet Union. This V has in mind the divisions so prevalent in our world today. In the U.S., between left and right (and make no mistake, the Vs represent neither side, specifically), and worldwide, between the U.S. and Everyone Else. And c’mon, anyway, this show is produced in the U.S. for a U.S. audience, so the action’s going to take place here. Just like Doctor Who takes place in England and Wales.

I like how the spaceships give a nod to the miniseries, too. They bear more than a passing resemblance to the originals, while looking way cooler.

Read full story

3 Comments »

Flash Forward – most definitely not a flash in the pan

November 8th, 2009 | by | flash forward

Nov
08

FlashForward_logoI’ve been rather lax in my blogging this season, in part because there’s more decent to good sci-fi on the tellybox right now than there’s been in a good long time, so trying to catch up with it all has been a challenge.

I was inspired to write this post now, however, after reading 5 Reasons Flash Forward is a Flash in the Pan on CinemaBlend, because I don’t agree with pretty much any of their five points.

So consider this to be a rebuttal, point by point:

Bad Acting: Let’s just agree to disagree on that. Is all the acting stellar? No. But there are few shows where all the actors are top-notch. But don’t badmouth PENNAH! (Lost fans, you know what I’m talking about.) I do think it’s funny that half the actors on the show are Brits, though only a couple are playing actual Brits. But Joseph is fine as the lead and the guy who played Steve Saunders in Coupling is pretty good in his role. Charlie as the bad guy is proving quite interesting and I think that everyone’s kind of growing into their roles.

Picture 1

Too big of a problem: What? The folks here have a problem with the scope of the problem. People are “just going back to work.” Well, I think FBI folks and others in law enforcement would seem kind of likely to go back to work. They’re naturally going to want to get to the bottom of it. And doctors, nurses and the like are going to be swamped at work and feel more needed than ever – and they are. I think we’ve seen quite a bit of chaos at that level. And I think we’ve seen a fair bit of chaos around. Especially with last week’s episode and the Blue Hand. (By the way, how happy am I that Callum Keith Rennie is in this show? Words cannot express.) Sure, there are some moments that are a bit incongruous: Janis’ date and the art gallery opening were a little odd – there only to establish that she’s a lesbian (making her pregnancy odder) and then to get her shot. Seemed unlikely that she’d have much time for a dinner date in a fine restaurant (and, sure, odd that the restaurant is open, but the owners have still got to earn a living, right?). How is this any bigger of a problem than the Visitors? Or some strange forces causing a plane to crash on an island hidden by time with specific people on board?

Who are the villains?: Again, this is a bit of red herring. In 24, for example, we’d have been given misdirection on the villains about a half dozen times already. On Lost, we hadn’t seen The Others yet. We’ve already met two people involved and seen another on that surveillance tape from the sports stadium. We’ve gotten hints of other people who may or may not be involved. We’ve gotten lots of clues and it’s obvious that even by the time April rolls around, the FBI folks won’t have the full picture. But we’re building Benford’s board now, piecing together many clues. We also have intrigue from the White House – the president and newly minted vice president. And, I wonder, is Aaron’s daughter somehow involved? And what about the previous incident in Africa? There’s a pattern here.

The (yawn) characters (yaaaawwwwnn) are “yaaaaaaawwwwwnnnnn”: We’ll have to agree to disagree, again. Anyone who thought Al was a boring character saw it all pulled together with his suicide last week. He leaped to his death for partly selfless and partly selfish reasons. He knows that sometime in the future, he’ll accidentally kill a mother of two. He can’t live with the thought that he’ll kill someone innocent, even if it’s not on purpose. But he also wants to show Demetri that he CAN change the future, that it’s not immutable. That armed with knowledge of the future, you can make a change, though it may have to be utterly drastic – or maybe just minor, like taping the windows so a bird doesn’t fly into it. This brings me to one of the biggest themes in the shows I watch right now: The immutability of the future, but I’ll get to that after the fifth and final rebuttal. Demetri’s attempts to figure out his future, Bryce’s sudden change from suicidal to lover of life, Nicole’s efforts to atone for a future sin are all intriguing. To me, anyway.

FFJanisDemetri

The Lost problem: This is the one point I have to give CinemaBlend. It’s natural the show would be compared to Lost, because it’s a weird mystery, sort of sci-fi-ish and it’s on ABC. Plus, you have Charlie and PENNAH! But it’s not fair to any show to compare it to Lost. Lost has been an utterly unique experience. Brilliantly crafted, written and acted, with few missteps, no show can hope to measure up. Nor should any try. I have to admit, the kangaroo hopping around has kind of weirded me out, too. On Lost, the kangaroo would totally represent something, and that makes viewers think it represents something on Flash Forward, too. I can’t imagine what it might represent. If it doesn’t, WTF? And if it does, well, WTF?

OK, so that’s the five points Cinemablend brought up. But I’d like to examine the issue of an immutable future. I’ve written about this before, in relation to Lost and Supernatural.

Flash Forward, at first, seemed to fall down on the side of the future being firm, unchanging, predetermined.

As all the pieces started falling into place after everyone regained consciousness, it seemed at first that things would happen as they would. And when Al first put the pistol to his chin and pulled the trigger, he was betting on that immutability.

But he came to realize that if you want to change something badly enough, you have to make a major change. Sometimes the flutter of butterfly’s wings may be enough — taping the window to prevent a bird from flying into it and dying. Sometimes it takes something far greater — jumping off a building to prevent a woman from being killed.

So maybe Demetri needs to do something drastic. Maybe there are two futures. May his fiance isn’t lying and actually saw him in her vision. Maybe he has a big decision to make and if he goes in one direction, he is killed. And he goes in another, and he’s not. I’m betting the people responsible for the loss of consciousness (or losses) didn’t bet on that. They’re assuming that everyone’s going to see the same future, that there’s just one path. But there isn’t, and I think that’s what the Demetri storyline is all about, as was Al’s.

And I’m on the side of multiple possibilities for the future. I don’t think the future is predetermined. I think all possibilities exist and each decision you make leads you on the path to each future.

3 Comments »

Supernatural: The End. Kinda.

October 2nd, 2009 | by | supernatural

Oct
02

An interesting episode of Supernatural last night. The main question posed is one that seems to come up on all the shows I watch, somehow.

Can we change our future? Our past? Is the timeline immutable? If you see your future, is it possible to change the past, or are you stuck because you’ve seen it, so whatever you do to avoid it will end up just changing the details but not the end result?

supernatural

I’m gonna go out on a limb and say that the five-years-in-the-future zombie-ish apocalyptic reality doesn’t have to happen. First off, the angels as we’ve seen them have not been exactly honest with Sam and Dean up to this point, and I wouldn’t put it past them to show Dean a reality that could, but doesn’t have to happen.

Second, would Eric Kripke really have embarked upon a five-year journey like this and, in the end, let the Devil and his minions win?

Of course, one of the things I’ve liked about Supernatural is that it doesn’t always deliver the nice, happy ending (thinking right now of Season 4′s “Jump the Shark,” when it turns out the Winchester brothers actually did have another brother, but he was killed by the ghouls pretending to be that brother and his mother). So does that mean the world will survive the apocalypse?

I like not knowing. Makes it more interesting to watch.

Read full story

7 Comments »

Supernatural returns tonight!

September 10th, 2009 | by | lost, supernatural

Sep
10

And, yes, I’m watching.

The CW lists tonight’s episode as “Sympathy for the Devil” (I’m guessing we’re going to hear a little of the Rolling Stones on the soundtrack, no?) and here’s the official description:

Picking up where the finale left off, Dean (Jensen Ackles) and Sam (Jared Padalecki) watch as the Devil (guest star Mark Pellegrino, “Lost”) emerges from Hell.

The brothers and Bobby (Jim Beaver) deal with the aftermath of Lucifer rising and the stunning news from Chuck the Prophet (guest star Rob Benedict) that Castiel (Misha Collins) was blown to bits by the archangels.

Robert Singer directed the episode written by Eric Kripke.

LA Premiere Of The Number 23 - Arrivals

Yes, Mark Pellegrino (center), otherwise known as Jacob from Lost. I loves me some cross-pollination, but I fear this might cause Beth & Erika to have coronaries.

Supernatural.tv says the second episode is “Good God, Y’all!” and is described thusly:

IS THIS THE END? — Castiel (Misha Collins) tells Sam (Jared Padalecki) and Dean (Jensen Ackles) that he is going to search for God, who will be able to defeat Lucifer. Bobby’s (Jim Beaver) old hunter friend, Rufus (guest star Steven Williams), is panicked about demons attacking his town, and begs Bobby for help. Sam and Dean arrive at the town and realize there is a spell over the townspeople, making them hallucinate that they are demons and causing them to kill one another. Phil Sgriccia directed the episode written by Sera Gamble.

I think we’re in for a beautiful ride, folks.

1 Comment »

Totally cool Lost posters, plus some casting news

September 4th, 2009 | by | heroes, lost

Sep
04

I have to tell you, ABC totally has learned how to do the viral thing with Lost in its roster.

Lost banner

To commemorate the final season, there’s 16 “top designers and artists” who also are fans of the show who have been commissioned “to create artwork celebrating one of the series’ most memorable, and unforgettable, ‘water cooler’ moments.” They are made in series of 300, all are hand-signed and numbered and measure 18×24. Look to cost $50.

Seems as if they’re being rolled out one a week and the first one was Hurley-centric, including nods to the meteor hitting Mr. Cluck’s, Connect 4 and Leonard and the car chase that ended in his capture. It has glow-in-the-dark elements on it, too.

The second was Locke-centric, “Just don’t tell him what he can’t do,” and designed very much in a classic movie-poster style. It’s already sold out.

The most recent one unveiled is the Dharma VW van, made out of flowers.

All the others just have a big ? on them.

Oh, and as io9 pointed out, they’re all being sold by “Ronie Midfew Arts,” which is “likely an anagram for “Widmore Fine Arts.”

Have I mentioned how much I love this show yet how crazy it makes me?

And speaking of Lost:
• TVOvermind has the news that the puppetmaster from Heroes has signed on for Lost’s final season. Not much known about who Eric Doyle will play, though it’s supposed he’ll either be Melky or Russell (see the next bullet point for explanation.
• Dark UFO had some casting info:

[MELKY] Male, 30s to 40s, any ethnicity. Dangerous looking guy that can be surprisingly calm. Runs a seedy chop shop and not someone to be messed with; has handled many dicey situations and is not thrown by anything…NICE CO-STAR

[JENNY] Female, early 30s, any ethnicity. Yuppie, sweet, happy and well off. Never had any problems until she receives heart-breaking news that tears her world apart. While dealing with her personal crisis, she then has to deliver bad news to someone else knowing it will hurt them, too…CO-STAR

[RUSSELL] Male, late 20s to early 40s, any ethnicity. Tough guy who takes no gruff from anyone. Executes orders efficiently but has a nice, compassionate streak that surfaces from time to time…CO-STAR

Now, what “NICE CO-STAR” means as opposed to “CO-STAR,” one can only guess. I keep going back and forth between thinking it means he’s a good guy and thinking it just means it’s a big role or has the potential to come back for more.

Or, of course, none of the above, and Cuse and Darlton knew this would get out, so they’re screwing with us by saying something like that. They’re for the third episode of the season

All this just makes me want Season 6 to come soooo much sooner than January. But knowing it’s the end, I don’t want it to start too soon, because that means it’ll come to an end that much earlier.

1 Comment »